Management of standing pig production information, decision making supported by soft methodologies


Authors

  • Miguel Ojeda Enríquez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22517/23447214.17101

Keywords:

Production Management, soft systems methodologies Dynamics of Systems, management of information, ping production

Abstract

The transformation and progressive evolution of the pig sector, towards more complex, technified and larger systems, has caused that the management of the data of the dynamics of production being fundamental to achieve a high level of information, allowing an efficient decision-making and effective. This article presents an organizational study experience oriented to the design of a model for the management of information in pig production on foot for La Esperanza farm of Fusagasugá Colombia. The design was based on the interpretation of the system of human activities (productive system) through the soft systems methodology (MSB) and, in the identification of productive dynamics and decision making, through system dynamics (DS) with the software "Evolution 4.5". Finally, the model for the management of information guided the construction of a prototype of the information system, "UCPigModel", which serves the human pig production system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. A.Ruiz, (2016, Agosto 18). “Las TIC en el sector agropecuario y agroindustrial”. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.genbiogan.com/singlepost/2016/05/18/Las-TIC-en-el-sectoragropecuario-y-agroindustrial. [Accedido: 20-ene - 2018].

. J. S. Peter Checkland, “La metodologia de sistemas suaves en acción/ Soft Systems Methodology In Action”, Editorial Limusa S.A. De C.V. pp 349,. 2002.

. J. Sterman. “Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. USA”: Irwin McGraw-Hill. 2000.

. P. Checkland y J. Poulter, “Learning for Action: A short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students, Chichester”: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2006

. P. Checkland & S. Holwell. “Information, Systems and Information Systems - making sense of the field”. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1998.

. R.C. Cañas. “Alimentación y Nutrición Animal”, 2 edición. Chile: Ediciones Facultad de Agronomía. Universidad Católica de Chile. 2000

. M.A. Ojeda, J. Quevedo y N. Gámez., “Modelo de optimización para minimizar costos de piensos porcinos en pie (levante, ceba y finalizador)," Scientia Et Technica, vol. 23, jul. 2018.

. H. H, Andrade, I. R, Dyner, A, Espinosa, H, López, R, Sotaquirá. “Pensamiento Sistémico: Diversidad en búsqueda de Unidad” Primera Edición, Bucaramanga, Ediciones Universidad Industrial de Santander, 2001.

. M. Bunge. “Big questions come in bundles, hence they should be tackled systemically” Systema: Connecting matter, life, culture and technology. ISSN: 2305-6991. Volumen 2, 2014.

. H. Andrade, E. Lince, E. Hernández y A. Monsalve. “Evolución: Herramienta software para el modelado y la simulación con Dinámica de Sistemas” Revista de Dinámica de Sistemas. Vol. 5 Núm. 1, septiembre. 2010

. U. Gómez, H. Andrade, C. Vásquez. “Lineamientos Metodológicos para construir Ambientes de Aprendizaje en Sistemas Productivos Agropecuarios soportados en Dinámica de Sistemas”. Información Tecnológica Vol. 26 (4), pp. 125-136, agosto 2015. [Online]. http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext& pid=S0718-07642015000400016

. R. Miles “Learning UML 2.0: A Pragmatic Introduction to UML” 1st Edition. Series: A Pragmatic Introduction to UML. O'Reilly Media; 1, edition, 286 pages, 2006.

. L. Welling & L. Thomson. “PHP and MySQL Web Development (5th Edition)” Developer's Library. Addison-Wesley Professional; 5 editions. 688 pages, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-30

How to Cite

Ojeda Enríquez, M. (2018). Management of standing pig production information, decision making supported by soft methodologies. Scientia Et Technica, 23(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.22517/23447214.17101

Issue

Section

Sistemas y Computación