Assessment of learning of Platonic solids by using augmented reality and situations didactic theory


Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22517/23447214.24771

Keywords:

Augmented Reality, Platonic solids, Theory of Didactic situation, Learning.

Abstract

The augmented reality (AR) is a technology that combines in real time the environment information with the lived information of the virtual environment. This technology can be used in the theory of didactic situations (TDS) for the learning of spatial geometry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of AR and TDS on the learning of Platonic solids (PS) in junior high school (7th degree) students. 40 students were allotted in both an experimental -EG- (n=20) and a control group -CG- (n=20). Students from EG received a didactic sequence related to PS and AR and CG received a traditional study class with a 3D PS. The learning of the students of both groups was assessed by semiquantitative scale (from 1 to 4) comparing data gathered at the beginning of the study (pretest results) with data obtained after applying the didactic sequence or receiving the traditional study class. Results from both groups were compared with a U-Mann-Whitney test. Data were presented as median (range) A P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Pretest data revealed that the start previous knowledge about PS was similar between both groups. Posttest data shown that students of the EG learned better about PS than students of the CG. The use of AR and TDS could improve the learning PS in students because they can easily identify and interact with the common patterns of this geometric elements as if these were real objects.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luis Hernando Carmona Ramírez, Universidad Católica de Manizales

Docente instrucctor 

Unidad Académica de Formación en ciencias naturales y matemáticas

References

[1] Z. Gecu‐Parmaksiz and O. Delialioglu, “Augmented reality‐based virtual manipulatives versus physical manipulatives for teaching geometric shapes to preschool children,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 3376–3390, 2019, doi: 10.1111 / bjet.12740.
[2] S. Tzima, G. Styliaras, and A. Bassounas, “Augmented Reality Applications in Education: Teachers Point of View,” Education Sciences , vol. 9, no. 2. 2019, doi: 10.3390/educsci9020099.
[3] S. Kim, H. Chi, and K. Ramani, “Object Synthesis by Learning Part Geometry with Surface and Volumetric Representations,” Comput. Des., vol. 130, p. 102932, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2020.102932.
[4] K. Langer, S. Lietze, and G. C. Krizek, “Vector AR3-APP – A Good-Practice Example of Learning with Augmented Reality,” Eur. J. Open, Distance E-Learning, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 51–64, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2020-0010.
[5] M. B. Ibáñez, A. Uriarte Portillo, R. Zatarain Cabada, and M. L. Barrón, Impact of augmented reality technology on academic achievement and motivation of students from public and private Mexican schools. A case study in a middle-school geometry course, vol. 145. Pergamon, 2020.
[6] I. De la Horra Villacé, “Realidad aumentada, una revolución educativa,” EDMETIC, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 9, 2016, doi: 10.21071/edmetic.v6i1.5762.
[7] C. Erbas and V. Demirer, “The effects of augmented reality on students’ academic achievement and motivation in a biology course,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 450–458, 2019, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12350.
[8] E. T. Gün and B. Atasoy, “The effects of augmented reality on elementary school students’ spatial ability and academic achievement,” Egit. ve Bilim, vol. 42, no. 191, pp. 31–51, 2017, doi: 10.15390/EB.2017.7140.
[9] G. Brousseau, Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics: Didactique des Mathématiques, 1970–1990. 2002.
[10] E. C. Wittmann, “Unfolding the Educational and Practical Resources Inherent in Mathematics for Teaching Mathematics,” in Connecting Mathematics and Mathematics Education, Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 1–24.
[11] G. Brousseau and V. Warfield, “Didactic Situations in Mathematics Education BT - Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education,” S. Lerman, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 206–213.
[12] G. Albano, “e-Mathematics Engineering for Effective Learning,” Springer, Cham, 2017, pp. 349–370.
[13] T. Prodromou, Augmented Reality in Educational Settings. Brill | Sense, 2019.
[14] “Unity Real-Time Development Platform | 3D, 2D VR & AR Engine.” .
[15] C. Flavián, S. Ibáñez-Sánchez, and C. Orús, “The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 100, pp. 547–560, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.050.
[16] H. Elmunsyah, W. N. Hidayat, and K. Asfani, “Interactive learning media innovation: utilization of augmented reality and pop-up book to improve user’s learning autonomy,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1193, p. 12031, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1193/1/012031.
[17] C. E. G. Reyes, “Perception of high school students about using Metaverse in augmented reality learning experiences in mathematics,” Pixel-Bit, Rev. Medios y Educ., vol. 58, pp. 143–159, 2020, doi: 10.12795/pixelbit.74367.
[18] E. İbili, M. Çat, D. Resnyansky, S. Şahin, and M. Billinghurst, “An assessment of geometry teaching supported with augmented reality teaching materials to enhance students’ 3D geometry thinking skills,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 224–246, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2019.1583382.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-06

How to Cite

Carmona Ramírez, L. H., & Montoya-Suárez, L. Ángel. (2023). Assessment of learning of Platonic solids by using augmented reality and situations didactic theory. Scientia Et Technica, 27(4), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.22517/23447214.24771

Issue

Section

Ciencias Básicas