nZEB buildings, analysis of the research trend
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22517/23447214.24795Keywords:
Sustainable Development, Efficiency, NZEB, Energy Performance, Research Trends.Abstract
In this paper, the research trend in relation to the NZEB buildings is explored, through the analysis of selected scientific articles published in 11 journals collected in chronological order from 2014 to 2020. The analysis is carried out on the basis and terms of annual investigative publications of the documents in relation to the NZEB, such as contributions made by countries, institutions, authors, and research topics covered. The study carried out uses a document review methodology. The analysis reveals a growing interest in energy efficiency research in recent times, implying that the importance that the construction industry attaches to NZEB in consequences of global warming and accelerating environmental problems. The findings also indicate that, during the period studied, researchers in developed economy areas such as the US and Italy contributed higher rates to promoting research on NZEB. Developing countries like China also went to great lengths to promote research. Research topics covered tend to focus on studies completed with NZEB project delivery and development, building rehabilitation, energy performance, and advanced technologies applied for energy improvement in buildings. This research provides a valuable platform for industry professionals and researchers to understand NZEB construction research trends and developments, including their applicability and their future research and contributions to the topic.
Downloads
References
[1] Y. Ma, M. Gong, H. Zhao, and X. Li, “Contribution of road dust from Low Impact Development (LID) construction sites to atmospheric pollution from heavy metals,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 698, p. 134243, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134243.
[2] D. Cheriyan and J. ho Choi, “A review of research on particulate matter pollution in the construction industry,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 254. Elsevier Ltd, p. 120077, May 01, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120077.
[3] A. Alvanchi, M. Rahimi, M. Mousavi, and H. Alikhani, “Construction schedule, an influential factor on air pollution in urban infrastructure projects,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 255, p. 120222, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120222.
[4] D. Gatt, C. Yousif, M. Cellura, L. Camilleri, and F. Guarino, “Assessment of building energy modelling studies to meet the requirements of the new Energy Performance of Buildings Directive,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 127, p. 109886, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109886.
[5] A. A. Hassan and K. El-Rayes, “Optimizing the integration of renewable energy in existing buildings,” Energy Build., vol. 238, p. 110851, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110851.
[6] A. Vilches, A. Garcia-Martinez, and B. Sanchez-Montañes, “Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 135. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 286–301, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.042.
[7] K. Qu, X. Chen, Y. Wang, J. Calautit, S. Riffat, and X. Cui, “Comprehensive energy, economic and thermal comfort assessments for the passive energy retrofit of historical buildings - A case study of a late nineteenth-century Victorian house renovation in the UK,” Energy, vol. 220, p. 119646, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119646.
[8] D. Mikulić, S. Slijepčević, and G. Buturac, “Energy renovation of multi apartment buildings: Contributions to economy and climate changes,” Energy Build., vol. 224, p. 110247, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110247.
[9] J. Terés-Zubiaga et al., “Cost-effective building renovation at district level combining energy efficiency & renewables – Methodology assessment proposed in IEA-Annex 75 and a demonstration case study,” Energy Build., vol. 224, p. 110280, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110280.
[10] J. F. Armendariz-Lopez, A. P. Arena-Granados, M. E. Gonzalez-Trevizo, A. Luna-Leon, and G. Bojorquez-Morales, “Energy payback time and Greenhouse Gas emissions: Studying the international energy agency guidelines architecture,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 196, pp. 1566–1575, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.134.
[11] A. Stephan and L. Stephan, “Achieving net zero life cycle primary energy and greenhouse gas emissions apartment buildings in a Mediterranean climate,” Appl. Energy, vol. 280, p. 115932, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115932.
[12] V. Costanzo, K. Fabbri, and S. Piraccini, “Stressing the passive behavior of a Passivhaus: An evidence-based scenario analysis for a Mediterranean case study,” Build. Environ., vol. 142, pp. 265–277, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.035.
[13] N. Bonatz, R. Guo, W. Wu, and L. Liu, “A comparative study of the interlinkages between energy poverty and low carbon development in China and Germany by developing an energy poverty index,” Energy Build., vol. 183, pp. 817–831, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.09.042.
[14] B. E. Tarazona, C. L. Sandoval R, C. G. Cárdenas Arias, J. G. Ascanio V., and J. J. Valencia N., “Detection of structural alterations in metal bodies: An approximation using Fourier transform and principal component analysis (PCA),” Sci. Tech., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 255–260, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.22517/23447214.23501.
[15] J. Palmer Real et al., “Characterisation of thermal energy dynamics of residential buildings with scarce data,” Energy Build., vol. 230, p. 110530, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110530.
[16] L. Evangelisti, C. Guattari, F. Asdrubali, and R. de Lieto Vollaro, “In situ thermal characterization of existing buildings aiming at NZEB standard: A methodological approach,” Dev. Built Environ., vol. 2, no. March, p. 100008, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100008.
[17] A. D. Rincón-Quintero, L. A. Del Portillo-Valdés, A. Meneses-Jácome, J. G. Ascanio-Villabona, B. E. Tarazona-Romero, and M. A. Durán-Sarmiento, “Performance Evaluation and Effectiveness of a Solar-Biomass Hybrid Dryer for Drying Homogeneous of Cocoa Beans Using LabView Software and Arduino Hardware,” Springer, Cham, 2021, pp. 238–252.
[18] B. E. Tarazona-Romero, A. Campos-Celador, Y. A. Muñoz-Maldonado, J. G. Ascanio-Villabona, M. A. Duran-Sarmiento, and A. D. Rincón-Quintero, “Development of a Fresnel Artisanal System for the Production of Hot Water or Steam,” Springer, Cham, 2021, pp. 196–209.
[19] G. Desogus, S. Mura, and R. Ricciu, “Comparing different approaches to in situ measurement of building components thermal resistance,” Energy Build., vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2613–2620, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.05.025.
[20] S. Colclough, O. Kinnane, N. Hewitt, and P. Griffiths, “Investigation of nZEB social housing built to the Passive House standard,” Energy Build., vol. 179, pp. 344–359, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.069.
[21] P. Wu, Y. Song, W. Shou, H. Chi, H. Y. Chong, and M. Sutrisna, “A comprehensive analysis of the credits obtained by LEED 2009 certified green buildings,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 68. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 370–379, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.007.
[22] J. G. Ascanio-Villabona, L. A. Del Portillo-Valdés, O. Lengerke-Pérez, B. E. T. Romero, A. D. Rincón-Quintero, and M. A. Durán-Sarmiento, “Analysis of the Energy Potential of a Tangential Microturbine for Application in a Passivhaus Environment,” Springer, Cham, 2021, pp. 181–195.
[23] Y. Lu, S. Wang, C. Yan, and Z. Huang, “Robust optimal design of renewable energy system in nearly/net zero energy buildings under uncertainties,” Appl. Energy, vol. 187, pp. 62–71, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.042.
[24] U. (EIA) Energy Information Administration, “Annual Energy Outlook 2012,” 2012.
[25] Matan Mayer, Blanca Dasi Espuig, and Martin Bechthold, “Energy Retrofit Tradeoffs in Residential Enclosures,” J. Natl. Inst. Build. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14–18, 2017.
[26] K. Voss, E. Musall, and M. Lichtmeß, “From low-energy to net zero-energy buildings: Status and perspectives,” J. Green Build., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 46–57, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.3992/jgb.6.1.46.
[27] K. Khamraev, D. Cheriyan, and J. ho Choi, “A review on health risk assessment of PM in the construction industry – Current situation and future directions,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 758. Elsevier B.V., p. 143716, Mar. 01, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143716.
[28] C. C. Tsai and M. L. Wen, “Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002: A content analysis of publication in selected journals,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3–14, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/0950069042000243727.
[29] Y. Lee and C. A. Yue, “Status of internal communication research in public relations: An analysis of published articles in nine scholarly journals from 1970 to 2019,” Public Relat. Rev., vol. 46, no. 3, p. 101906, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101906.
[30] P. Moran, J. O’Connell, and J. Goggins, “Sustainable energy efficiency retrofits as residenial buildings move towards nearly zero energy building (NZEB) standards,” Energy Build., vol. 211, p. 109816, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109816.
[31] A. Magrini, G. Lentini, S. Cuman, A. Bodrato, and L. Marenco, “From nearly zero energy buildings (NZEB) to positive energy buildings (PEB): The next challenge - The most recent European trends with some notes on the energy analysis of a forerunner PEB example,” Dev. Built Environ., vol. 3, no. March, p. 100019, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100019.
Europa, “DIRECTIVA 2010/31/UE del Parlamento Europea y del Consejo de 19 de mayo de 2010 relativa a la eficiencia energética de los edificios,” 2010.
[33] S. Attia, “Evolution of Definitions and Approaches,” in Net Zero Energy Buildings (NZEB), Elsevier, 2018, pp. 21–51.
[34] G. Yang, S. Mabu, K. Shimada, and K. Hirasawa, “A novel evolutionary method to search interesting association rules by keywords,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 13378–13385, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.166.
[35] European Union, “DIRECTIVE 2010/75/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 24 November 2010,” Off. J. Eur. Union, 2010.
[36] M. Ferrara and E. Fabrizio, “Cost optimal nZEBs in future climate scenarios,” Energy Procedia, vol. 122, pp. 877–882, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.377.
[37] E. Pikas, J. Kurnitski, M. Thalfeldt, and L. Koskela, “Cost-benefit analysis of nZEB energy efficiency strategies with on-site photovoltaic generation,” Energy, vol. 128, pp. 291–301, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.158.
[38] S. Deng, R. Z. Wang, and Y. J. Dai, “How to evaluate performance of net zero energy building - A literature research,” Energy, vol. 71, no. 2014, pp. 1–16, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.007.
[39] A. Hamburg, K. Kuusk, A. Mikola, and T. Kalamees, “Realisation of energy performance targets of an old apartment building renovated to nZEB,” Energy, vol. 194, p. 116874, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116874.
[40] F. Asdrubali, I. Ballarini, V. Corrado, L. Evangelisti, G. Grazieschi, and C. Guattari, “Energy and environmental payback times for an NZEB retrofit,” Build. Environ., vol. 147, no. October 2018, pp. 461–472, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.047.
[41] P. Pallis et al., “Towards ΝZEB in Greece: A comparative study between cost optimality and energy efficiency for newly constructed residential buildings,” Energy Build., vol. 198, pp. 115–137, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.06.005.
[42] F. Causone, A. Tatti, M. Pietrobon, F. Zanghirella, and L. Pagliano, “Yearly operational performance of a nZEB in the Mediterranean climate,” Energy Build., vol. 198, pp. 243–260, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.062.
[43] P. Chastas, T. Theodosiou, D. Bikas, and K. Tsikaloudaki, “Integrating embodied impact into the context of EPBD recast: An assessment on the cost-optimal levels of nZEBs,” Energy Build., vol. 215, p. 109863, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109863.
[44] D. Kim, H. Cho, J. Koh, and P. Im, “Net-zero energy building design and life-cycle cost analysis with air-source variable refrigerant flow and distributed photovoltaic systems,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 118, no. August 2019, p. 109508, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109508.
[45] F. Asdrubali, P. Baggio, A. Prada, G. Grazieschi, and C. Guattari, “Dynamic life cycle assessment modelling of a NZEB building,” Energy, vol. 191, no. xxxx, p. 116489, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116489.
[46] M. M. Sesana and G. Salvalai, “Overview on life cycle methodologies and economic feasibility fornZEBs,” Building and Environment, vol. 67. Pergamon, pp. 211–216, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.05.022.
[47] D. D’Agostino and L. Mazzarella, “Data on energy consumption and Nearly zero energy buildings (NZEBs) in Europe,” Data Br., vol. 21, pp. 2470–2474, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.11.094.
[48] E. Aparicio-Gonzalez, S. Domingo-Irigoyen, and A. Sánchez-Ostiz, “Rooftop extension as a solution to reach nZEB in building renovation. Application through typology classification at a neighborhood level,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 57, no. December 2019, p. 102109, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102109.
[49] G. De Luca, I. Ballarini, A. Lorenzati, and V. Corrado, “Renovation of a social house into a NZEB: Use of renewable energy sources and economic implications,” Renew. Energy, vol. 159, pp. 356–370, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.170.
[50] F. Ascione, M. Borrelli, R. F. De Masi, and G. P. Vanol, “Nearly zero energy target and indoor comfort in Mediterranean climate: Discussion based on monitoring data for a real case study,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 61, no. June, p. 102349, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102349.
[51] D. D’Agostino, B. Cuniberti, and I. Maschio, “Criteria and structure of a harmonised data collection for NZEBs retrofit buildings in Europe,” Energy Procedia, vol. 140, pp. 170–181, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.133.
[52] I. Yahyaoui, G. Tina, M. Chaabene, and F. Tadeo, “Design and Evaluation of a Renewable Water Pumping System,” in IFAC-PapersOnLine, Jan. 2015, vol. 48, no. 30, pp. 462–467, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.12.422.
[53] P. Huang, G. Huang, and Y. Sun, “A robust design of nearly zero energy building systems considering performance degradation and maintenance,” Energy, vol. 163, pp. 905–919, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.183.
[54] R. E. González-Mahecha, A. F. P. Lucena, A. Szklo, P. Ferreira, and A. I. F. Vaz, “Optimization model for evaluating on-site renewable technologies with storage in zero/nearly zero energy buildings,” Energy Build., vol. 172, pp. 505–516, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.04.027.
[55] A. Thomas, C. C. Menassa, and V. R. Kamat, “A systems simulation framework to realize net-zero building energy retrofits,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 41, pp. 405–420, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.045.
[56] J. Andrey and C. Cañas, “EVALUACIÓN DEL CONFORT TÉRMICO EN LA VIVIENDA RURAL EXISTENTE EN COLOMBIA,” Universidad La Gran Colombia, 2020.
[57] R. Bruno, N. Arcuri, and C. Carpino, “Study of innovative solutions of the building envelope for passive houses in Mediterranean areas,” Energy Procedia, vol. 140, pp. 80–92, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.125.
[58] J. Sierra-Pérez, B. Rodríguez-Soria, J. Boschmonart-Rives, and X. Gabarrell, “Integrated life cycle assessment and thermodynamic simulation of a public building’s envelope renovation: Conventional vs. Passivhaus proposal,” Appl. Energy, vol. 212, pp. 1510–1521, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.101.
[59] G. Ulpiani, D. Giuliani, A. Romagnoli, and C. di Perna, “Experimental monitoring of a sunspace applied to a NZEB mock-up: Assessing and comparing the energy benefits of different configurations,” Energy Build., vol. 152, pp. 194–215, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.034.
[60] Y. Zhou and S. Cao, “Investigation of the flexibility of a residential net-zero energy building (NZEB) integrated with an electric vehicle in Hong Kong,” Energy Procedia, vol. 158, pp. 2567–2579, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.005.
Downloads
-
Vistas(Views): 174
- PDF Descargas(Downloads): 202
- HTML (Español (España)) Descargas(Downloads): 11
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Scientia et Technica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyrights
The journal is free open access. The papers are published under the Creative Commons Attribution / Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International - CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. For this reason, the author or authors of a manuscript accepted for publication will yield all the economic rights to the Universidad Tecnológica of Pereira free of charge, taking into account the following:
In the event that the submitted manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors must grant permission to the journal, in unlimited time, to reproduce, to edit, distribute, exhibit and publish anywhere, either by means printed, electronic, databases, repositories, optical discs, Internet or any other required medium. In all cases, the journal preserves the obligation to respect, the moral rights of the authors, contained in article 30 of Law 23 of 1982 of the Government Colombian.
The transferors using ASSIGNMENT OF PATRIMONIAL RIGHTS letter declare that all the material that is part of the article is entirely free of copyright. Therefore, the authors are responsible for any litigation or related claim to intellectual property rights. They exonerate of all responsibility to the Universidad Tecnológica of Pereira (publishing entity) and the Scientia et Technica journal. Likewise, the authors accept that the work presented will be distributed in free open access, safeguarding copyright under the Creative Commons Attribution / Recognition-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es license.